News
InspecTech®
A Division of InspecTech Analygas Group Inc.
450 Midwest Road, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M1P 3A9
Tel: 416-757-1179      Fax: 416-757-8096
Email: group@inspectech.ca    Web: www.inspectech.ca

ULTRASONIC TRANSDUCERS FOR PIPE WELD TESTING

or NOW YOU SEE IT, NOW YOU DON'T


Back in the 1970's, a group of engineers at Republic Steel looked into ultrasonic testing of longseam tube welds. In particular, they were concerned with the huge variations in signal level as a conventional transducer is shifted towards or away from the weld line.


So severe are these echo variations that a defect can be lost completely if a probe is misplaced by as little as 2mm. Therefore if conventional transducers are used to test ERW welds, the probe to weld spacing must not only be exact,

it must remain exact throughout the test.


Graph 1 shows what happens when a conventional probe/wedge assembly is used to test an ERW weld in a typical Oilfield Tubular product. The test defect is a 10% o.d. notch, and it becomes quite “invisible” if the probe happens to be a millimetre or two away from its ideal position. Note, that for this and all other tests, we set the equipment gain to give 100% full screen signal at the highest peak, then assumed a 50% alarm trigger level (shown in red) is being used to decide detectability. This is quite similar to real operating conditions.


The Republic Steel group

came up with the concept

of the “involute” transducer,

which was configured to

produce a very large beam

at equal angles of incidence

to the tube surface, and thus

generate a more uniform

ultrasonic beam through the

weld profile. In 1980 U.S.

Patent 4,195,530 was

awarded to B.J. Ross et al.

and assigned to Republic

Steel. Republic licensed

the technology to other

users, but deep pockets

were needed to enjoy the

benefits of this innovation.


Republic Steel is no more, but

involute transducers have lived

on, and they are still obtainable

from a new owner of the patent.


InspecTech, a few years later, pursued a different line of enquiry, and we came up with our current technology, which is

unrelated to involutes.

The InspecTech Inquirer
Vol.3 No.2 Winter 2008

Natalia (Rosa) D'Elia


Natalia (Rosa) has just passed her 15 year mark as an employee of Inspectech Analygas Group, and she deserves a medal for her dedicated long service to the Group.


Rosa looks after our electronic assembly functions, a big job considering the number and complexity of components that go into a modern circuit card. Today much of her work requires the use of optical instruments when dealing with surface mounted components.


It is thanks in part to Rosa's dedication to the highest quality standards that our electronic equipment has such an excellent record of longevity. Many of our systems in the field have 10 or more years of operation with never an electronic failure.


Bravo Rosa!

Meet The People

We wish all our readers a safe and happy holiday season and a defect-free New Year.

Chart1

Recently, a customer who uses both InspecTech probes and involute probes came to us with some testing questions, and we had the opportunity to make a direct comparison of probe technologies. The results were interesting enough that we would like to share them with our readers. Two important parameters were examined.

(1) The distance-amplitude relationship of the probe to weld spacing

(2) The ability to detect small defects.

The results are shown in graphs 2, 3 and 4.

Comparing Graph 1 with Graphs 2 & 3, it is immediately obvious that the more advanced probes offer a huge benefit over the conventional  unit. The signal level is more uniform with probe position, meaning that defects are much less likely to be missed because of weld wander. Graphs 2 & 3 both demonstrate a wide range of probe to weld positions that will not result in missed defects.


Graph 4 tells a different story. Here we see a

comparison of responses to different sizes and

types of defects. Most people standardise their

U/T on 10% notches that are 1” (25mm) long,

although some codes allow for twice that length.

What happens when the test defect gets shorter?

We have plotted the response of both probes to

exactly the same 10% test defect, but also when

it is reduced to 0.5” and 0.25” long, and the results

tell an interesting tale. What happens further,

when the defect becomes smaller and rounded

(penetrators anyone)? Here you can see why

InspecTech probes routinely pick up penetrators

less than 1mm long, whereas other systems cannot.


The conclusion is that while expensive involute

probes offer superior  distance-amplitude

characteristics, standard InspecTech probes are

just as good, but work much better on small defects.


It is not difficult to do the tests that have been described here, and the test pieces are easy to make. Everybody concerned with weld line testing on ERW product should run similar tests. If you don't like the results you get, call us.

Chart2.jpg Chart3.jpg Chart4.jpg Rosa